Amount of Omega 3 Fatty Acids in Fish and Seafood

For 100 grams portion

New Seafood Dish in the Menu of Nakau (なか卯) Chain in Japan

Rice Bowl with Salmon and Salmon Roe

The price for a small bowl is 490 yen and the regular one is 790 yen, tax included.

In Pictures: Food of the Erwin RekaMoreOkean in Moscow, Russia

Fish and Seafood Fine Dining

The Restaurant

Major U.S. Restaurant Supplier of Sustainable Seafood Accused of Mislabeling Fish

Brenna Houck wrote . . . . . . . .

One of the U.S.’s biggest and most trusted sustainable seafood suppliers Sea to Table has been accused of falsely advertising and mislabeling its fish. An extensive investigation by the Associated Press found that the New York-based seafood distributor has been marketing seafood as “local“ and “wild caught“ when some of its seafood was actually farmed or illegally caught out of season. In some cases, Sea to Table was sourcing from foreign suppliers known for appalling labor abuses and the poaching of sharks, whales, and dolphins.

In order to trace the fish fraud, the AP staked out fish markets, followed delivery trucks, and conducted interviews with fishermen around the world. In many instances, reporters found that customers received seafood orders with receipts listing boats fishing in local U.S. harbors. However, the boats hadn’t fished in the locations where the fish were purportedly caught in several years.

One Indonesian fisherman named Sulistyo described the horrible conditions he endured working 22-hour days on a boat associated with the Sea to Table supply chain. “We were treated like slaves,” he says, claiming he was paid $1.50 a day and not given enough food and water. His story, and others, mirror a 2015 report by the AP on slavery in the fishing industry, in which crew members on similar ships docking in Trinidad recounted beatings and forced labor. Workers claimed that some of these migrant workers died and were stored in the fish freezers while the boats continued fishing.

Sea to Table owner Sean Dimin told the AP the company was taking the allegations “extremely seriously.” He denied mislabeling seafood and misrepresenting products. When asked about farmed shellfish, Dimin characterized it as “a very small part of our business, but it’s something that we’re open and clear about.” However, shortly after the AP initially inquired for its story, Dimin changed his mind and said he would halt the sale of farmed seafood altogether. He also suspended partnerships with two suppliers associated with the human rights and environmental abuses while Sea to Table performs an audit.

In a statement on the company’s website today responding to the AP report, Dimin placed blame on Sea to Table’s suppliers:

The idea that we could be associated — even very loosely — with an organization that engages in poor labor practices is outright horrifying to us. We work every day to improve the seafood industry’s historically questionable practices. One such way is to source 100% domestic seafood. We would never knowingly purchase fish that doesn’t conform to our exacting standards.

We are unwavering in our commitment to sourcing sustainable, U.S. wild-caught seafood and making it easily accessible to customers across the nation. Sea to Table remains committed to making sure our suppliers are held to the highest level of transparency. There is still work to be done as we continue to be an agent of positive change in the historically opaque seafood industry.

Seafood is notoriously difficult to trace back to its source. One 2016 study by seafood watchdog group Oceana found that a full 20 percent of 25,000 seafood samples collected worldwide were mislabeled. If the labels aren’t correct, that makes it particularly difficult for restaurants, chefs, and consumers that are trying to make environmentally friendly seafood purchases. And it explains why they’d turn to a company like Sea to Table to provide them with a reliable source of quality, sustainably caught seafood — often at a premium.

Over the years, Sea to Table had partnered with sustainable seafood groups like Monterey Bay Aquarium and Marine Stewardship Council and had been highlighted in a variety of publications such as GQ, the New York Times, and Bon Appetit. Sea to Table even managed to dupe Larry Olmsted, author of a definitive book on food fraud, Real Food, Fake Food. Chef Rick Bayless was a customer of Sea to Table and told the AP he was saddened to learn that the stories of working with fishermen in small towns along the U.S. coastline weren’t true. “This throws quite a wrench in all of that,” he says.

Source: Eater

What Seafood Should You Eat If You Don’t Want A Sea Without Fish

Deena Shanker wrote . . . . . .

Chef Telepan wants to make porgy happen.

Porgy swim along the U.S. coast in large numbers, blissfully unknown to many American diners, while shrimp, tuna and salmon, often from thousands of miles away, remain the big kahunas. But as chefs, who long ago made farm-to-table food ubiquitous, set their sights on the oceans, the lowly porgy is getting some time in the sun.

At Oceana, Bill Telepan recently added it to his menu, replacing a farmed dorade. At $38, it is the least expensive seafood-based second course of the four-and-a-half-star Midtown Manhattan restaurant’s dinner offerings. For a fish once considered mere by-catch, caught inadvertently by fishermen hunting for more valuable species, it’s still quite a feat.

Porgy isn’t the only change at Oceana since Telepan, whose eponymous, Michelin-starred restaurant was a farm-to-table pioneer, came aboard last fall. In June, he committed the restaurant to Smart Catch, a new sustainable-seafood effort led by the James Beard Foundation, which aims to get restaurants to serve better seafood choices. The idea is to take the very complicated question, “Is this seafood sustainable,” and answer it for consumers with a logo. If the restaurant is a Smart Catch participant, diners can enjoy their seafood—whether salmon, oysters, or porgy, farmed, wild, fresh or frozen—at ease.

“What I’m trying to do,” Telepan said, “is take this ship and turn it in a sustainable direction.”

The Smart Catch program is well-timed, with growing consumer interest in both eating seafood at restaurants and learning more about the provenance of their food. Orders for clam and lobster at independent, full-service restaurants, as well as salmon servings in the “casual independent” category, all increased by double digits in the year that ended in March from the year before, according to the NPD Group, even as at-home dining on seafood stayed flat.

But seafood presents its own minefield when it comes to sustainability. Unlike with land-based proteins, there is no U.S. Department of Agriculture “organic” seal for seafood. Terms such as “farmed” and “wild” don’t necessarily indicate whether something is responsibly raised or caught. Wild seafood can contribute to overfishing. Aquaculture can involve crowded pens, escapes of farmed fish into the wild and the overuse of antibiotics. Still, both can be done with minimal environmental impacts. Meanwhile, in what seafood journalist Paul Greenberg has dubbed “The Great Fish Swap,” more than 91 percent of seafood eaten by Americans comes from overseas, while a third of what gets caught domestically gets exported.

Consumers may be overestimating their knowledge of this complicated topic: Some 57 percent think they are somewhat or very knowledgeable about the origin of their seafood, according to a forthcoming Keynote Report on Seafood from Datassential, even though only 16 percent have ever checked seafood purchasing guidelines such as those from the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch.

For restaurants, signaling seafood sustainability is still a rarity. Only 1.1 percent of restaurant seafood menus have the word or a derivative of it on their menus today, according to Datassential, and that’s nearly three times what it was in 2013. Other language is more popular. “Wild” appears on 9.3 percent of seafood menus. “Local” is mentioned on 4.6 percent, up a third since 2013.

Smart Catch, which launched nationally under the James Beard banner in June after a 2015 pilot in Seattle, is a chef-friendly marketing tool to help diners bypass the confusing terminology with a simple logo. Chefs can sign up for a menu-assessment and education program, Katherine Miller, the Beard Foundation’s senior policy director, said. The program now counts 292 restaurants in its ranks. It relies on information collected by the nongovernmental organization FishChoice to measure the sustainability of seafood, using ratings from Seafood Watch—green for “best choice,” yellow for “good alternatives” and red for “avoid”—or, if that’s unavailable for a given fishery, from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

A chef enters his or her planned order, including the kinds of seafood, quantities and sources, and FishChoice provides a score. If part of an order is rated low, FishChoice usually offers better alternatives so the chef can make the necessary adjustments. To become a Smart Catch “leader,” a restaurant must score an 80 percent or higher. This is all done out of the customer’s sight, though anyone can look up a Seafood Watch rating for a particular piece of fish.

“Seafood can be very confusing,” Miller said. “What if one species from one fishery is a green but the same species from another fishery might be a yellow or a red?”

If chefs serve more green options, the thinking goes, consumers will purchase more green options, whether they mean to or not. But even the program’s cheerleaders at Beard don’t pretend they’ve got a perfect system. The FishChoice tool is based on the ratings of Seafood Watch, which works with major companies like Compass Group and Disney Parks and Resorts and addresses the most commonly consumed seafood in the U.S.—but, at this point, doesn’t include everything a chef like Telepan serves. “What is being missed is the importance of the local sources that big buyers can’t work with,” said Corey Peet, the Smart Catch sustainability adviser. “The rankings are missing those pieces.” That’s one reason a restaurant needs only an 80% on its test, he said—so that a choice from a sustainable but relatively small, and therefore unrated, fishery can still be served.

For a restaurant such as Oceana, which serves a variety of seafood options totaling about 1,000 pounds a week, the complications can be worth the effort. Those with a much narrower seafood menu can take a simpler approach. Chopt, an East Coast salad chain with more than 40 locations, recently announced a new partnership with Sea to Table, which sells traceable, U.S.-caught, wild seafood, to source its shrimp.

“We do it for the flavor,” Chopt co-founder Colin McCabe said. “We know there’s a direct correlation between the flavor and the sustainability and transparency.”

Chopt was so unhappy with the shrimp from its previous supplier, a sustainably certified farm in Asia, that it was “on the edge of killing the ingredient,” McCabe said. He found that Sea to Table, whose shrimp tasted better, was more traceable and was even cost-neutral because of its higher yield after cooking. The chain is now buying about 10,000 pounds of Sea to Table shrimp each month.

Wild seafood isn’t necessarily a better choice than farmed, but Sea to Table founder Sean Dimin develops close relationships with his fishermen to make sure they’re using the industry’s best practices. For the Gulf shrimp sold at Chopt, as well as in other restaurants, dining halls and directly to consumers through the company’s website, Dimin makes sure boats use the legally required “turtle excluder devices,” which keep sea turtles from getting stuck in nets, as well as by-catch reduction devices, which cut the amount of unintended captures for a shrimper.

“That produces a pretty clean fishery right there,” Dimin said.

Both Smart Catch and Sea to Table could increase the amount of sustainably caught or harvested seafood consumers eat. The question is whether their efforts, when combined with those of consumer brands and retailers, will raise consumer awareness of sustainable seafood enough to create the kind of demand that took farm-to-table into the mainstream.

With Smart Catch, consumers would have to care enough to seek out, or just notice, the logo, and then go farther by asking the staff what makes any particular piece of seafood “sustainable.” At that point, the staff needs to have the information to answer them. That’s a tall order, especially in a busy restaurant.

At a recent lunch at Oceana, a patron asked the waiter what kind of fish was in the fish and chips and was told it was hake. It was actually local spiny dogfish, an abundant species, rated yellow by the Monterey Bay Aquarium, that suffers from an unfortunate name. It’s also high in mercury if fished in certain waters, such as those off Australia or Crete, while those fished in the Northwest Atlantic, where Chef Telepan’s originate, have lower levels than do such commonly consumed species as albacore tuna or mackerel. A concerned diner would require a knowledgeable server.

“Some of the waiters can answer questions, but not all,” Telepan said.

The porgy is going well, he said. “We got complaints from customers about the bones”—porgies are famous for them—“but we found a new way to butcher it before we cook it,” which solved the problem.

Current menus and marketing materials at Chopt don’t mention Sea to Table, and asking a salad assembler for information requires shouting over the heads of other patrons putting in their orders. Not exactly an ideal learning environment, but the chain says it will be adding Sea to Table’s name to items soon. At that point, the onus again returns to the customer to find out what makes the ingredient exceptional, if sea-to-table is ever to approach the popularity of farm-to-table. Plus, while Smart Catch participants are incorporating lesser-known species, broadening customers’ seafood horizons, Chopt is still playing it safe, serving Americans’ favorite seafood.

Experts see both campaigns as steps in the right direction.

“The consumer public has only recently engaged in sustainable seafood to the point where it can be a return on investment,” said Barton Seaver, an author and chef and the director of the Sustainable Seafood and Health Initiative at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “And that makes a big difference, because what do restaurants do? They sell.” Smart Catch, he said, “creates an atmosphere of trust.” If consumers want sustainable seafood, giving them an easy way to find it is a good thing, even if educating them is a bigger challenge.

“There are a lot of emblems and certifications” already out there, said TJ Tate, director of the Sustainable Seafood Program at the National Aquarium in Baltimore, and “the jury’s still out” for her on Smart Catch, since the first iteration of the program (not connected to the Beard Foundation) didn’t get very far. “But James Beard has the integrity and platform that they’re not going to put things out without high quality,” she said, which makes her hopeful that such kinks as uneducated servers will get worked out.

Both Seaver and Tate are ebullient about Sea to Table, even if the partnership with Chopt indulges the American shrimp obsession that led to the disreputable farming practices common in Asia.

“Getting Americans to not eat shrimp is like saying, you know what—that TV—how about we read a book instead?” Seaver said.

Tate hopes Chopt will eventually expand its seafood offerings into less charted waters, noting that Sea to Table would be a good partner, since it sells a number of underused species such as Gulf of Maine redfish and Chef Telepan’s favorite, Atlantic spiny dogfish.

“We don’t have any plans for by-catch now,” McCabe said. He occasionally runs specials to gauge consumer interest in new ingredients, but the two examples the restaurant gave were both of another American standby: salmon.

Source: Bloomberg